Those how are veteran war historians will quibble at some parts of Dunkirk, notably the separation of English and French troops in evacuation and the ships used to evacuate them. To add to this insult we pretty much get to see the same bloody event over and over from different angles. Then we have the spitfire which runs out of fuel and glides around forever over the beach so the director can get some scenic shots done. Acting is excellent throughout, and versimilitude is achieved with models of aircraft, uniforms, landing stages and so on. Tense film draws you to a doomed group. There were multiple stories and perspectives, all which immerse you into the current situation. Mayıs 1940'ta İngiltere, Kanada, Fransa ve Belçika'ya ait müttefik ordularından 400 bin asker, Fransa'nın İngiltere'ye çok yakın Dunkerque Dunkirk bölgesinde Alman Ordusu tarafından karadan tamamen kuşatılmıştır.
Tom Hardy just flying over the coast was amazing. Our few glimpses are of German fighters and so on, with very explanation of the goings-on at the front. Dunkirk uses a few conceits to keep you involved. Not one, not one of them has any semblance of a character arc. I think I arguably felt some tension in the earlier moments, and some of the shots were beautiful. Saving Private Ryan isn't about World War 2. When people talk about a film they think it's about the setting, but it's actually about the characters.
This is an insult to all the brave men that made this rescue possible. Again, I see how Nolan tried to convey the impersonality of war and insignificance of the individual but he did it with such a heavy, clumsy hand, providing us with no counterpoint with which to drive the point home. Dunkirk did a great job of allowing us to focus less on the actors and more on the story. Dünya Savaşı'nın ilk yıllarında Nazi Almanyası'nın net bir üstünlüğü vardır. There are a few likable people in the movie. It tells a story about a squad of soldiers tasked with finding a young Private Ryan and getting him back safely to his family. Saying Dunkirk is a film about the Battle of Dunkirk however, is not inaccurate.
We see intercut scenes from different periods, prior, during and enacting the rout. Unfortunately that is all there is. Dunkirk was a major undertaking with almost 400 000 soldiers involved and hundreds and hundreds of boats. Dunkirk is a beautiful and unconventional World War 2 epic that is undoubtedly captivating, but it takes risks that may alienate some viewers. Sure the movie is a cinematically very well down movie. If one oversight might have been addressed, it is the lack of focus on the German side of things in this affair. But Tom Hardy could not save this movie.
In some ways, it feels like watching a documentary with the narration turned off. There are no memorable characters to be found here, and one wonders even if there are any actual characters at all. However a few days ago I finally did and, given all the hype, I have to say that I expected more, a lot more. But no, the story starts right away with these measly handful of boats and planes taking for bloody ever to drag themselves over to where they are supposed to go. Injections of friendship and subsequent loss direct our affection to the sufferers.
. I didn't know who was running where or if this person had died yet and the lack of dialogue was no help at all. We get to see what? I find it difficult to understand exactly what drew him to this film so strongly. Almanlar bu askerleri hava bombardımanlarıyla yok etmeyi planlarken, İngiliz Başbakanı Churchill'in yönlendirmesiyle askerleri kurtarabilmek için çok tehlikeli ve savaşın gelişimi açısından hayati önemde bir tahliye operasyonu başlatılır. Wouldn't watch it again I have put off viewing this film for quite a while. The first, which adds a notable amount of tension to the film, is a ticking clock in the background moving you to the final day.
A few columns of soldiers, a handful of boats and three pitiful spitfires against a bomber and two Fock Wulfes. The rest are either psychotic or morons. First of all, where the hell did the over-inflated budget go? I would also have expected some pre-story. We don't know anything about these characters that we see and I personally didn't feel any emotions for the movie, even though I wanted to. Genre Action, Drama, History, Thriller, War Imdb Rating 8. I feel this movie put me in the story and allowed to experience first hand some of the lives that were impacted. I found myself quite bored halfway through the movie, the whole time I kept expecting more.
Acting, camera and all that is excellent. With all the jumping around in the story I could not tell who was where and what was going on half the time. I see what he was trying to do on the cinematic side but it made it difficult as the viewer to fully follow it all the way. Production value was amazing and some of the scenes were absolutely stunning! Other times fairly large boats gets damaged and flips over in seconds. I was on the edge of my seat for the majority of the movie.
The setting and characters are one. Christopher Nolan did a great job of creating an overwhelming feeling of hopelessness throughout the movie, I felt like I could never feel safe and constantly looked for a way out. The main reason for this is that I am somewhat reluctant watching a movie where the story is pretty well known before you sit down to watch it. Dünya Savaşı'nın seyrini etkileyen olaylardan Dunkirk Tahliyesi'ni karadan, havadan ve denizden farklı bakış açılarıyla izleyiciye aktarıyor. Overall an excellent war movie meant to be among your top ten, if not top five It will be hard to dislodge All Quiet on the Western Front, Apocalypse Now, Paths of Glory, Saving Private Ryan and Tora Tora Tora! The choppy waters of the English Channel are equally as important, if not more so than the people who fought and died in them. Like the scene where a bunch of soldiers are trapped in a boat being shot to pieces. Like the Navy commander and the elderly guy on the pleasure boat steaming to rescue.